Chemical reaction, absorption. One way of allowing for design uncertainties and feedstock variation is by installing alternate feed points. Due to the thin sheets of structured packings, their materials of construction need to have better resistance to oxidation or corrosion. The valves are either moveable (con-ventional) or fixed. Cleaning trays is much easier than cleaning packings. Structured packing towers offer more surface area and have a lower pressure drop than packed towers do. Option 2: Sulzer Mellapak TM structured packing (Fig. The benefits of structured packing come at a price. Structured Packing. 2. Vacuum systems. Mellapak is the most widely used structured packing worldwide. 5) allows the size of the column to be reduced with a higher F-factor of ~2.3 Pa 0.5 . Feed composition variation. Three trays are very cheep ones and their maintenance is easy. Structured packing can be manufactured from corrugated sheets of perforated embossed metal, plastic (including PTFE), or wire gauze. Most separations can be performed either with trays or with packings. Very high-performance structured packing is seldom used for large commercial gas treating plants because of its high cost and sensitivity to plugging by small particles suspended in the solution. Structured packing is a type of packing proposed by Labbe known for its efficiency and low pressure drop.It allows to decrease the size of columns compared to other distillation column internals. Eng., p. 86 (April 2006)]. Structured Packing. Floats on moving valve trays tend to "stick" to deposits on the tray deck. Cost high 4. Generally speaking, trays are used in applications with liquid rates of 30 m3/m2-h and above, and/or those where solids are present or fouling is a con-cern. Pall rings or high-performance proprietary designs). The large open area of the larger random packing promotes foam dispersal. With the aid of serrated weirs, splash baffles, reverse-flow trays, and bubble-cap trays, low liquid rates can be handled better in trays. In packed towers, every alternate feed point requires expensive distribution equipment. Random packings suffer from liquid dewetting and maldistribution sensitivity at low liquid rates. Because of the smaller liquid holdup of packing, a higher percentage of the liquid can be recovered as top product. Figs. Better separation efficiency. Structured Packings The following factors generally favor trays compared to structured packings, but not compared to random packings. The practical range of packing materials is wider. For instance, column complexity is a factor favoring trays, but gas plant demethanizers that often use one or more interreboilers are traditionally packed. firstname.lastname@example.org Packing Tower Anatomy Random Packing Tray vs. Zuiderweg and Nutter [IChemE Symp. 2. Lower-pressure-drop applications. Moving valve and bubble-cap trays normally give better turndown than packings. Structured Packing Versus Trays. Maldistribution. In the loaded sections of the tower, larger packings can overcome capacity bottlenecks at the expense of loss in separation. Trays vs. Random packings are usually more troublesome than trays in services prone to process surges (e.g., those caused by slugs of water entering a hot oil tower, relief valve lifting, compressor surges, or instability of liquid seal loops). Eng. Progr., 90(2), 23 (1994)] reported a study of the relative capacity and efficiency of conventional trays, modern random packings, and conventional structured packings. Structured packing has about the same capacity as trays and random packings. The original packed towers used Raschig rings, hollow ceramic cylinders, typically 1 in outer diameter (OD), 0.75 in inner diameter (ID), and 1 in long.A state-of-the-art packing is called structured packing.This material is made of thin sheets of crimped or corrugated metal, with small holes, fastened together with thin bars. However, it’s advantages counter this. The performance of the Column in relation to the process requirements (dew point) is determined by carefully selecting the following parameters: (a) Height of packing (or # of trays) (b) Packing or Tray Design (c) Glycol Concentration Solids. Some information you will find in this text includes the following: Authored by Lili Lyddon - BR&E Technical Support / Help Author. The pressure drop advantage is invaluable in vacuum column revamps, can be translated to a capacity gain, an energy gain, a separation improvement, or various combinations of these benefits. Like the other 2 devices, the primary purpose of random packing is to create surface area for vapor/liquid contact so that Mother Nature (and Father Thermodynamics) can produce chemical separation. The aggressive surface ... trays. However, packing distributors are limited to fairly narrow liquid-rate ranges for effective performance. Materials of construction. Revamps. Foaming (and emulsion). Batch distillation. Very high-performance structured packing is seldom used for large commercial gas treating plants because of its high cost and sensitivity to plugging by small particles suspended in the solution. They are designed with a low F-factor of ~1.8 Pa 0.5 , resulting in large column sizes. The bottom pressure will be 170 mbar with trays, but only 90 to 110 mbar with packings. Trays and random packings have about the same efficiency and capacity. The low gas and liquid velocities in packing suppress foam formation. Experience indicates that use of structured packings has capacity/ efficiency disadvantages in the higher-pressure (higher-flow-parameter) region. In many cases recurrent foaming was alleviated by replacing trays by random packing, especially when tray downcomers were poorly designed. These translate to less product degradation, greater capacity, and smaller energy consumption, giving packings a major advantage. The random packing appears to have the highest capacity and efficiency with conventional trays just slightly behind. Structured packings are usually less troublesome than trays in such services. Weight. How does it work? 1. High liquid rates. ... Table 3 and Fig. Structured packed columns are shorter than trayed columns. Both gas and liquid velocities on trays are often an order of magnitude higher than through packing, providing a sweeping action that keeps tray openings clear. Trays and random packings have much the same efficiency and capacity. The efficiency advantage of structured packing over random packings and trays decreases from 1.5 to 1.2 as the parameter increases from 0.1 to 0.3. (Page 1) When it comes to distillation trays and packing, chemical processors require the same criteria they seek from all equipment in this tight economy — technology that will reduce energy use and boost throughput without costly facility expansion. structured packing has been successfully utilized in a variety of high liquid rate,high pressure systems besides the usual applications in vacuum and atmospheric processes normally reserved for structured packing. Option 1: Until the 1980s, TEG contactors were designed with bubble cap trays. The sieve trays have been developed when the hydrocarbon industry and the oil and gas industry have extended. Most of these fires were initiated by pyrophoric deposits, hot work (e.g., welding) above the packing, opening the tower while hot organics were still present, and packing metallurgy that was not fire-resistant. Our units are configured for easy onsite installation. Single pass sieve tray DN 1600 in stainless steel . Low liquid rates. Corrosive systems. Due to their sensitivity to maldistribution there is greater uncertainty in predicting packed column performance. Detailed discussion can be found in Fractionation Research Inc. (FRI) Design Practices Committee, "Causes and Prevention of Packing Fires," Chem. 9 provide a detailed comparison of trayed vs. structured packing contactors in the same service. They found that, for each device optimally designed for the design requirements, a rough guide could be developed on the basis of flow parameter L/G (pc/pL)0'5 (abcissa in. Academia.edu is a platform for academics to share research papers. Small-diameter columns. Typically, one needs 22 separations steps after a stripping run to adequately rectify upto 95%. This is often advantageous for reducing polymerization, degradation, or the inventory of hazardous materials. Structured packings are usually less troublesome than trays in such services. (2) Valve tray, the other common type, but marginally more expensive. operations where trayed towers are used. Washing and purging. Kohl (1997) contains excellent information concerning trayed vs. packed columns for gas treating applications. At this time, sieve tray columns are probably the most popular for both absorbers and strippers in conventional, large commercial amine plants; while packed columns are often used for revamps to increase capacity or efficiency and for special applications. Due to their snug fit, structured packings are easily damaged during removal. Both attributes make random packing excellent for handling foams. Packing pressure drop is much lower than that of trays because the packing open area approaches the tower cross-sectional area, while the tray's open area is only 8 to 15 percent of the tower cross-sectional area. 2. Interreboilers, intercondensers, cooling coils, and side drawoffs are more easily incorporated in trays than in packed towers. Not all trays are fouling-resistant. Depending on the type and supplier, structured packing may not be cheaper than trays. Structured packings are typically used in lower-liquid- Due to the compression ratio, pressure drop at the compressor discharge is far less important and seldom a controlling consideration. Trays vs. Either option is expensive. When the gas is moved by a fan through the tower, or when the tower is in the suction of a compressor, the smaller packing pressure drop is often a controlling consideration. The term structured packing refers to a range of specially designed materials for use in absorption and distillation columns. Trays vs. Random Packings The following factors generally favor trays compared to random packings, but not compared to structured packings. Bubble-cap trays and raschig ring packings were once commonly used in amine plant absorbers and strippers, however, modern plants are generally designed to use more effective trays (e.g., sieve or valve types) and improved packing shapes (e.g. Well sealed (often welded) bubble cap trays and random packing are the better options. We have a variety of glycol contactors with valve trays, bubble cap trays, or structured packing. This packing consists of a set of corrugated sheets in the form of honeycombs. Tray columns are particularly applicable for high pressure columns, where pressure drop is not an important consideration and gas purity specifications can readily be attained with about 20 trays. In general, packing can handle wide vapor-rate ranges. Trays require internal access for scheduled maintenance. Structured packing. This makes trays more robust. Plugging in liquid distributors has been a common trouble spot. 128, A481 (1992)] explain the loss of capacity/efficiency by a large degree of backmixing and vapor recycle at high flow parameters, promoted by the solid walls of the corrugated packing layers. There is much that can be done to alleviate plugging with random packing. Structured packing is generally more prone to maldistribution than random packing. When to Use Random vs. The factors below represent economic pros and cons that favor each and may be overridden. The trays are orifice-type devices designed to disperse the gas uniformly on the tray and through the liquid on the tray. Such large holes are readily applied with high liquid flow rates, but often not practical for small liquid flow rates. Unless very expensive distributors are used, packed tower turndown is usually limited by distributor turndown. Thorough removal of residual liquid, wash water, air, or process gas trapped in structured packings at startup and shutdown is more difficult than with trays. "Cartridge" trays or an oversized diameter are often used. Here excessive pressure drop in the tower increases the size of the fan or compressor (new plant), bottlenecks them (existing plant), and largely increases power consumption. Packing fires. Also, cleaning, cooling, and washing can be difficult, especially when distributors or packing plug up. Fouling-resistant trays have large sieve holes or large fixed valves, and these should be used when plugging and fouling are the primary considerations. Structured packing compared to random packing has 1. Maldistribution issues are most severe in large-diameter towers, long beds, small liquid flow rates, and smaller packing. Tower packing is sometimes referred to as tower internals or structured packing, random packing or trays. 5. Cartridge trays also run into problems with sealing to the tower wall and matching tower to tray hardware [Sands, Chem. Multipass trays effectively lower the liquid load "seen" by each part of the tray. Trays can be manufactured in nonmetals, but packing is usually a cheaper and more desirable alternative. Columns with diameter less than 1 m (3 ft) are difficult to access from inside to install and maintain the trays. A similar trick cannot be applied with packings. While good distributor design, water testing, and inspection can eliminate most maldistribution issues, it only takes a few small details that fall through the cracks to turn success into failure. Support plate: Support plates for random packing units are often multi-beam units, set on a continuous ring. Ceramic and plastic packings are cheap and effective. Trays, structured packing, or random packing in the column are used to effect an intimate contact between the vapor and liquid phases, permitting the transfer of mass and heat from one phase to the other. Structured Packings The following factors generally favor trays compared to structured packings, but not compared to random packings. Packings also offer an easy tradeoff between capacity and separation. The valve trays are typically with the covers provided to the per-forations of the sieve trays. Tower internals are arguably the most important piece of process equipment, since they cannot easily be accessed after startup. At low vapor rates, the decreased turbulence in structured packing can reduce efficiency. Packing is also preferred for columns where pressure drop and possible foam formation are important considerations. FLEXIPAC ® Structured Packing. Combining excellent capacity and efficiency char- Solids tend to accumulate in packing voids. Complex towers. 10.1 How Packed Towers Work. Packing is often specified for CO2 removal columns, where a high degree of CO2 removal is desired and the low efficiency of trays may result in objectionably tall columns. (5) Structured packing, made from folded metal sheets or gauze, the latter being much the more expensive. Switching from trays to structured packing can aggravate foaming. This is particularly true for towers operating close to atmospheric pressure. The thin sheets of structured packing (typically 0.1 mm) poorly dissipate heat away from hot spots. Structured packing efficiency is about 1.5 times that of trays or random packing. Performance prediction. Trays handle solids much more easily than packing. With respect to the Selexol process, I believe most - if not all of the absorbers - would be packed. Column wall inspection. The sensitivity of packing to liquid and gas maldistribution has been a common cause of failures in packed towers. Many incidents of packing fires during turnarounds (while towers with structured packings were open to atmosphere) have been reported. In packed towers, every complexity requires additional distribution and/or liquid collection equipment. © 2020 - Bryan Research & Engineering, LLC All Rights Reserved. The separation loss can often be regained by retrofitting with smaller packings in sections of the tower that are not highly loaded. Also, the tray liquid head, which incurs substantial pressure drop (typically about 50 mm of the liquid per tray), is absent in packing.